65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
I can't think of anything other than P. californicus, P. subnitidus, or mayyybe P. rugosus as possibilities (not sure what part of Orange County you're talking about). Without pictures, I don't think anyone can really help.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
In Irvine about the only thing is P. californicus. Get a good lateral view and we have a better chance of an Id.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
Pogonomyrmex californicus is used as a staple in studies on polygyne ants
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
Not sure if your species is Pogonomyrmex californicus or not, but all I can tell you is that my first colony has two queens, no workers yet. I bought these species and the vendor told me that the queens may eventually kill one each other off.
Edited by MrPurpleB, March 14 2017 - 7:19 PM.
I don't know about you Vendayn, but all the pogonomyrmex I find are usually identifiable and have very large healthy workers. Are you sure you're not mistaking the species?I can't think of many places in Irvine that a Pogonomyrmex would actually live that only has 6 inches of soil.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:36 PM.
Edited by Canadian anter, March 16 2017 - 3:26 PM.
Not P. maricopa in any way, shape or form. The apparent small epinotal spines alone let that species out.
65q24g4g5f
Edited by Vendayn, March 9 2018 - 7:37 PM.
I would say not P. salinus. Can you get a better shot of the epinotal spines?
What about subdentatus or occidentalis?
Not P. occidentalis for sure. Barring better images I am going to conclude this is a slightly aberrant P. californicus colony.
Edited by gcsnelling, March 18 2017 - 3:19 AM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users