Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Texas Army Ants (?)

Started By kellakk , Oct 30 2015 11:37 PM

Please log in to reply

9 replies to this topic

#1 Offline kellakk - Posted October 30 2015 - 11:37 PM

Advanced Member

Moderators
603 posts

LocationSouthern California

Check out these ants that someone found in Texas and posted on another forum. He thinks they're Labidus coecus.

http://www.arachnobo...nt-ID-..no-eyes

Current Species:
Camponotus fragilis

Novomessor cockerelli

Pogonomyrmex montanus

Pogonomyrmex rugosus

Manica bradleyi

#2 Offline dermy - Posted October 31 2015 - 1:11 AM

Advanced Member

Members
1,392 posts

LocationCanada

Whoa! Those look so cool! I love the size of the queen

How to post photos | Forum Rules | The List of Handy Links

#3 Offline gcsnelling - Posted October 31 2015 - 1:58 AM

Expert

Members
1,682 posts

As I posted there, hard to be sure of the ID based on those photos, but it is a quite possible they are L. coecus.

#4 Offline TheAnswerIsTheLogic - Posted October 31 2015 - 6:44 AM

Advanced Member

Members
92 posts

LocationRomania,Dambovita

The queen is soo huge haha

#5 Offline klawfran3 - Posted October 31 2015 - 6:53 AM

Advanced Member

Members
256 posts

I know right? When I saw that picture for the first time I thought the queen was an oblong pebble! My jaw dropped when I realized it was her gaster haha.

This message brought to you by the Committee for the Education of Folks who Describe Arthropod Taxa as 'Not Interesting' (CEFDATNI)

#6 Offline dspdrew - Posted October 31 2015 - 7:42 AM

Owner

Administrator
9,858 posts

LocationSanta Ana, CA

Wow that is cool!

My Ant Colonies | My Projects | Ants for Sale | Ant Keeping Products | Southern California Ant Map

#7 Offline Alza - Posted October 31 2015 - 8:44 AM

Advanced Member

Members
864 posts

LocationThe Village

It is labidus.

#8 Offline gcsnelling - Posted October 31 2015 - 10:07 AM

Expert

Members
1,682 posts

It is labidus.

While I do not disagree with your comment I am curious as to how you come to that conclusion.

#9 Offline James C. Trager - Posted November 3 2015 - 4:38 AM

Expert

Moderators
376 posts

The head shape of the major workers, petiole/ postpetiole characters of the workers, and the head and petiole shapes of the queen, combined with the location, pretty much clinch this as L. coecus, woudln't you say, gcsnelling?