Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Formica fusca group? Found in Southeastern Michigan. 7/24/2024


Best Answer Mettcollsuss , August 1 2024 - 11:41 AM

Formica fusca group, almost certainly subsericea, however there are some rarer species that cannot be definitively ruled out. We would need to see the relative density of the pubescence on the third and fourth tergites and/or the presence or absence of large punctures on the malar area in order to distinguish it from F. argentea, and the relative density of the gaster pubescence and pilosity to separate from species like subaenescens, podzolica, or glacialis.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Offline michiganantsinmyyard - Posted July 26 2024 - 4:44 PM

michiganantsinmyyard

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • LocationCommerce Township, Michigan

Pretty sure this is fusca group, but I would rather have people more experienced than me come to a conclusion.

 

I know its probably quite hard to nail a species down, but I'm guessing this is subsericea.

 

Approximately 10mm.

 

Untitled design (1).png

 

IMG_2217.JPG


  • cooIboyJ likes this

#2 Offline Stubyvast - Posted July 26 2024 - 6:12 PM

Stubyvast

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 225 posts
  • LocationBC, Canada

Wow she looks aggressive in that first photo! And pretty fat with food! Formica subsericea is my guess.


  • Artisan_Ants likes this

Currently raising: 

Myrmica Rubra (1 queen +  ~5 workers)

Lasius Niger (single queen + ~90+ workers)

Lasius Neoniger (two single queen + brood)

Formica spp. (Queen [likely parasitic, needs brood])

Also keeping a friend's tetramorium immigrans for the foreseeable future. Thanks CoffeBlock!


#3 Offline Artisan_Ants - Posted July 27 2024 - 2:21 AM

Artisan_Ants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationChester County, PA
It could also be F. neogagates but I don't see any silver band on the gaster from these pics indicating F. subsericea. Although it still could be F. subsericea.

Keeping:

3x - S. molesta (colonies and single queen)                1x - C. nearcticus (founding but no eggs)   (y) New!

1x - C. chromaiodes (colony)                                       1x - C. subbarbatus (founding)  

1x - F. subsericea (founding)                                        1x - T. sessile (mega colony)

3x - P. imparis (colonies)  

2x - L. neoniger (founding)

 

Check out my C. nearcticus journal here: https://www.formicul...cticus-journal/

Check out my C. chromaiodes journal here: https://www.formicul...aiodes-journal/


#4 Offline michiganantsinmyyard - Posted July 27 2024 - 7:18 AM

michiganantsinmyyard

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • LocationCommerce Township, Michigan

It could also be F. neogagates but I don't see any silver band on the gaster from these pics indicating F. subsericea. Although it still could be F. subsericea.

If it’s any help in direct sunlight the gaster is highly silver in color.

#5 Offline Artisan_Ants - Posted July 27 2024 - 7:46 AM

Artisan_Ants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationChester County, PA

It could also be F. neogagates but I don't see any silver band on the gaster from these pics indicating F. subsericea. Although it still could be F. subsericea.

If it’s any help in direct sunlight the gaster is highly silver in color.
Then yeah that's definitely F. subsericea (as from what I know, F. neogagates is a completely solid color with no silver effect to the gaster. The setae on their gaster comparatively is the same exact as F. subsericea at least to the naked eye).

Keeping:

3x - S. molesta (colonies and single queen)                1x - C. nearcticus (founding but no eggs)   (y) New!

1x - C. chromaiodes (colony)                                       1x - C. subbarbatus (founding)  

1x - F. subsericea (founding)                                        1x - T. sessile (mega colony)

3x - P. imparis (colonies)  

2x - L. neoniger (founding)

 

Check out my C. nearcticus journal here: https://www.formicul...cticus-journal/

Check out my C. chromaiodes journal here: https://www.formicul...aiodes-journal/


#6 Offline michiganantsinmyyard - Posted July 27 2024 - 7:54 AM

michiganantsinmyyard

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • LocationCommerce Township, Michigan


It could also be F. neogagates but I don't see any silver band on the gaster from these pics indicating F. subsericea. Although it still could be F. subsericea.

If it’s any help in direct sunlight the gaster is highly silver in color.
Then yeah that's definitely F. subsericea (as from what I know, F. neogagates is a completely solid color with no silver effect to the gaster. The setae on their gaster comparatively is the same exact as F. subsericea at least
to the naked eye).
I did find the queen in a field woodland border, with a marsh nearby. I don’t know if that’s any indication of species however.

#7 Offline Artisan_Ants - Posted July 27 2024 - 8:31 AM

Artisan_Ants

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationChester County, PA
F. subsericea can be found practically anywhere with a field or just some vegetation here and there. They would definitely be found near a woodland edge near a field as it provides great resources for a colony of this species.

Keeping:

3x - S. molesta (colonies and single queen)                1x - C. nearcticus (founding but no eggs)   (y) New!

1x - C. chromaiodes (colony)                                       1x - C. subbarbatus (founding)  

1x - F. subsericea (founding)                                        1x - T. sessile (mega colony)

3x - P. imparis (colonies)  

2x - L. neoniger (founding)

 

Check out my C. nearcticus journal here: https://www.formicul...cticus-journal/

Check out my C. chromaiodes journal here: https://www.formicul...aiodes-journal/


#8 Offline OwlThatLikesAnts - Posted July 31 2024 - 7:24 PM

OwlThatLikesAnts

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts
It is definitely f. subsercia considering that you are in the states and the abdomen is shiny. F. fusca is the one in Europe

Also I am currently keeping them and they outgrew my L. niger colony with larva that is 2 stages ahead of theirs in roughly 2 weeks

Currently keeping:

 

1x Solenopsis molesta

1x Formica subsericea (polygynous) has WORKERS!!!  :yahoo: RAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

2x Lasius niger (one is polygynous and the other is monogynous) 


#9 Online Mettcollsuss - Posted August 1 2024 - 11:41 AM   Best Answer

Mettcollsuss

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,762 posts
  • LocationChicago, IL

Formica fusca group, almost certainly subsericea, however there are some rarer species that cannot be definitively ruled out. We would need to see the relative density of the pubescence on the third and fourth tergites and/or the presence or absence of large punctures on the malar area in order to distinguish it from F. argentea, and the relative density of the gaster pubescence and pilosity to separate from species like subaenescens, podzolica, or glacialis.


  • Artisan_Ants and OwlThatLikesAnts like this

#10 Offline michiganantsinmyyard - Posted August 11 2024 - 1:57 PM

michiganantsinmyyard

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • LocationCommerce Township, Michigan

Formica fusca group, almost certainly subsericea, however there are some rarer species that cannot be definitively ruled out. We would need to see the relative density of the pubescence on the third and fourth tergites and/or the presence or absence of large punctures on the malar area in order to distinguish it from F. argentea, and the relative density of the gaster pubescence and pilosity to separate from species like subaenescens, podzolica, or glacialis.

Even though it doesn't matter, I probably will take pictures of those regions you listed and post it here. If you do reread this thread and find the pictures then it would be cool to know exact species if the pictures are adequate.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users