Found in SoCal, Tujunga at a park connected to a sandy trail at about 9 PM. The queen was on a tree when I caught her. She is about 10mm, all shiny black with some hairs on her gaster.
Edited by Tanks, June 11 2024 - 4:43 PM.
Best Answer YsTheAnt , June 11 2024 - 5:06 PM
Camponotus laevigatus.
Go to the full post
Found in SoCal, Tujunga at a park connected to a sandy trail at about 9 PM. The queen was on a tree when I caught her. She is about 10mm, all shiny black with some hairs on her gaster.
Edited by Tanks, June 11 2024 - 4:43 PM.
Looks like Camponotus Modoc or something like that. Definitely a Camponotus though. How long have you had her for? Looks like she's doing really great!
Currently raising:
Manica invidia (1 queen + ~20 workers)
Lasius niger (single queen + ~100+ workers)
Lasius neoniger (3 single queen + brood)
Formica spp. (Queen - infertile?)
Formica pacifica (Queen - infertile?)
Tetramorium immigrans (1 queen + ~1100 workers)
wasnt the name changed again? To C.laevissimus?
Edited by GOCAMPONOTUS, June 11 2024 - 5:54 PM.
Currently keeping: 2 C.vicinus colonies.2 C.sansabeanus. 1 C.leavissimus. 2 C.Ca02. 1 V.pergandei. 4 T.immigrans.1 F.pacifica. 1 C.hyatti
1 M.ergatognya
Trying to get my hands on :C.modoc,A.vercicolor, and Any Honeypots
Looks like Camponotus Modoc or something like that. Definitely a Camponotus though. How long have you had her for? Looks like she's doing really great!
They are not. They don't have red legs nor to my knowledge are in SoCal. Thanks though.
wasnt the name changed again? To C.laevissimus?
The name change happened once (Mackay, 2019) with C. quercicola being synonimized into C. laevigatus and a new taxon described for what many people erroneously IDed as C. laevigatus. This is C. laevigatus - C. laevissimus looks nothing like this at all.
They are not. They don't have red legs nor to my knowledge are in SoCal. Thanks though.
There is three known populations of C. modoc in Southern California.
wasnt the name changed again? To C.laevissimus?
The name change happened once (Mackay, 2019) with C. quercicola being synonimized into C. laevigatus and a new taxon described for what many people erroneously IDed as C. laevigatus. This is C. laevigatus - C. laevissimus looks nothing like this at all.
They are not. They don't have red legs nor to my knowledge are in SoCal. Thanks though.
There is three known populations of C. modoc in Southern California.
My bad, but this isn't modoc, right?
No not modoc
Currently keeping: 2 C.vicinus colonies.2 C.sansabeanus. 1 C.leavissimus. 2 C.Ca02. 1 V.pergandei. 4 T.immigrans.1 F.pacifica. 1 C.hyatti
1 M.ergatognya
Trying to get my hands on :C.modoc,A.vercicolor, and Any Honeypots
Ok so I was correct.
![]() |
Anting →
Ant ID Requests →
Camponotus ID North TexasStarted by AntsTx , Mar 15 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
|
![]() |
Ants & Myrmecology →
General →
Overcaring - Killing with KindnessStarted by rptraut , Mar 7 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
|
![]() |
Market Place →
General Market Place →
Trade: 3D-Printing Service for your Queens/Colonies (Los Angeles, CA)Started by JonathanH , Mar 4 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
|
Anting →
Ant ID Requests →
Camponotus ID, Whitney TXStarted by AntsTx , Feb 3 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Ants & Myrmecology →
General →
Best THA Decor Style for Camponotus pennsylvanicusStarted by AntsTx , Nov 27 2024 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users