Hi. I found this big queen ant under a rock. I am in Marble Falls, Texas and she was in a sandy area not far from a lake. I think I see wing scars on her back. Can you help me identify it?
Here is another picture
Edited by Jonathan5608, May 29 2023 - 4:21 PM.
chromaiodes do get that far south... but not that far west normally. But Camponotus vicinus lacks the broad major-like head on the queen. This ant looks near identical to my chromaiodes queen.
Are you in east TX by any chance?
Starting this July I'm posting videos of my ants every week on youTube.
I like to make relaxing videos that capture the joy of watching ants.
If that sounds like your kind of thing... follow me >here<.
Oh here is a guide with some of the things to look for to sort this out.
The location says Vicinus, but the features seem more chromaiodes... can you look carefully at the base of the scape and see if it is flat or round?
https://www.antscihu...bc-5297e37529ba
Starting this July I'm posting videos of my ants every week on youTube.
I like to make relaxing videos that capture the joy of watching ants.
If that sounds like your kind of thing... follow me >here<.
It does have a similar color pattern at glance — a black base with red on the legs and front of the gaster. As you pointed out, the range doesn't match. But most crucially, this ant is mostly hairless, lacking the dense golden hairs that chromaiodes have. This ant is also very glossy while chromaiodes are more matte. Some more subtle differences include a different head shape, and while not visible from these photos, distinctly flattened antennae scapes.chromaiodes do get that far south... but not that far west normally. But Camponotus vicinus lacks the broad major-like head on the queen. This ant looks near identical to my chromaiodes queen.
Are you in east TX by any chance?
I thought the queen abdomen had more color with theseCamponotus sansabeanus
I thought the queen abdomen had more color with theseCamponotus sansabeanus
It's not even close to C. sansabeanus.
I thought the queen abdomen had more color with these
Color is variable. Some morphs have queens with almost entirely orange gasters, and some nearly all black. For examples of sansabeanus queens, see here.
It's not even close to C. sansabeanus.
The sansabeanus group is extremely messy and in need of revision. There are multiple separate species that all get thrown under the name C. sansabeanus (for example, the undescribed Albuquerque species, which I believe would currently key out to C. sansabeanus), so I can definitely believe that these Texan ones are quite different to the Californian ones that you're used to, but they're both called sansabeanus nevertheless. In fact, these Texan ones are the "true" sansabeanus since the type location is in Texas.
Vicinus looks pretty convincing
vicinus is pretty rare in Texas, only a few sparse populations in the western side of the state (I'm fairly sure that AntMaps is wrong here). vicinus are in a similar boat as sansabeanus, where there's more than one species being called vicinus, so there's no one set definition for what vicinus queens look like. vicinus queens are often more matte, not glossy like this queen, and in the cases that vicinus queens are smooth and glossy, the head shape is still different.
Compare against some AntWeb specimens -- sansabeanus first, this queen second, vicinus third:
If you want to be extra sure, here's the list of Camponotus species recorded from TX according to AntWeb:
EDIT: I was wrong, the Albuquerque species actually keys out to semitestaceus.
Edited by Mettcollsuss, May 29 2023 - 8:02 PM.
Your nickname really fits here mr meticulous
Check out my Youtube!
https://www.youtube....ohUZtcyttLctSwA
I also have an Antstagram
https://www.instagra...otters_inverts/
It's not even close to C. sansabeanus.
The funny thing is Texas has true C. sansabeanus, in the sense that the original specimens used to decribe C. sansabeanus are from San Saba County, TX (where the epithet "sansabeanus" comes from). So, by technicality, these are as close to C. sansabeanus as it can get. If you use California C. "sansabeanus" to compare, this queen obviously will look like "It's not even close to C. sansabeanus" because CA doesn't really have many populations of actual C. sansabeanus.
I agree with all of y'all
Thank you everyone! Wow, I have a lot to study to figure this out. I am in Marble Falls which is Central Texas. I will try to take better pictures of her.
It's not even close to C. sansabeanus.
The funny thing is Texas has true C. sansabeanus, in the sense that the original specimens used to decribe C. sansabeanus are from San Saba County, TX (where the epithet "sansabeanus" comes from). So, by technicality, these are as close to C. sansabeanus as it can get. If you use California C. "sansabeanus" to compare, this queen obviously will look like "It's not even close to C. sansabeanus" because CA doesn't really have many populations of actual C. sansabeanus.
I wasn't referring to the common ones that people incorrectly think are C. sansabeanus.
I have never seen a C. vicinus with a head that wide. I have never seen them with a head much wider than the thorax.
I wasn't referring to the common ones that people incorrectly think are C. sansabeanus.
Nor was I.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users