Finally got myself a cheap digital microscope. I have been referring to this species from my yard as pallidefulva. Would you concur based on the mesosomal setae?
From https://www.antwiki....a_group_speciescouplet 1:
"Mesosomal dorsum without erect setae or with a small cluster on the mesonotum and/or a few erect hairs elsewhere; gaster shiny with sparse, short appressed pubescence and relative short, sparse, blunt pilosity"
versus
"Mesosomal dorsum with several to many erect setae on pronotum, mesonotum and propodeum; gastral tergite I shiny to dull with appressed pubescence of medium to high density"
Let me know if I need a better view. I appreciate the help!