Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

New York, NYC, Lasius(?) queen and workers... but what species?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Offline futurebird - Posted April 4 2022 - 2:56 PM

futurebird

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 836 posts
  • LocationNew York City, NY

At first I thought they were formica. Because of the big eyes.

 

bqchFQ0.jpg

 

But looking at my "new england ant guide" lasius seems more likely. Here is a size comparison with Lasius neoniger. I've used red lines to show the body length of each queen. She's a big girl for a lasius...

 

PPPHtAs.jpg

 

Her gaster is very large.

 

Udm8zEn.jpg

 

And like her daughters she has lovely big eyes. 

 

qtlhulq.jpg 

 

What species is this? It's not Formica subsericea... she looks nothing like that queen... 


  • m99 likes this

Starting this July I'm posting videos of my ants every week on youTube.

I like to make relaxing videos that capture the joy of watching ants.

If that sounds like your kind of thing... follow me >here<


#2 Online Manitobant - Posted April 4 2022 - 4:38 PM

Manitobant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,912 posts
  • LocationWinnipeg, Canada
Its definitely a formica species in the fusca group.
  • Antkeeper01, OiledOlives, UtahAnts and 1 other like this

#3 Offline futurebird - Posted April 4 2022 - 5:51 PM

futurebird

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 836 posts
  • LocationNew York City, NY

I thought fusca was only in europe


Starting this July I'm posting videos of my ants every week on youTube.

I like to make relaxing videos that capture the joy of watching ants.

If that sounds like your kind of thing... follow me >here<


#4 Offline ColAnt735 - Posted April 4 2022 - 5:59 PM

ColAnt735

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 406 posts
  • LocationOntario,Canada

I thought fusca was only in europe

Formica fusca are only in Europe although Manitobant is referring to the fusca group which is a subgenus in the genus Formica.


  • Manitobant, Antkeeper01, azzaaazzzz00 and 2 others like this

"If an ant carries an object a hundred times it's weight,you can carry burdens many times your size.


#5 Offline Mettcollsuss - Posted April 5 2022 - 5:15 AM

Mettcollsuss

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,767 posts
  • LocationChicago, IL

At first I thought they were formica. Because of the big eyes.

But looking at my "new england ant guide" lasius seems more likely. Here is a size comparison with Lasius neoniger. I've used red lines to show the body length of each queen. She's a big girl for a lasius...

Formica and Lasius have the issue of sounding very similar on paper, despite not being closely related. These ones are definitely Formica.

 

What species is this? It's not Formica subsericea... she looks nothing like that queen... 

What features don't seem like F. subsericea to you? I'm actually 99% sure it is F. subsericea. The workers have rounded heads, long antennal scapes, and are largely lacking erect hairs. The only identifying feature I can't make out very well are the hairs on the gaster (F. subsericea would have a decent number of hairs on the gaster and very few or no hairs anywhere else). I only hold off from giving a completely confident ID since these are nanitics and their features might not completely match up with full size workers. But I still believe enough features match, even as nanitics, to safely call these F. subsericea.

 

I thought fusca was only in europe

The species Formica fusca is, but the fusca group is much more broadly distributed. The fusca group is a taxonomic mess right now, but until it gets fixed up, species like this one are considered to be part of the fusca group.

https://antwiki.org/...es_groups#fusca


Edited by Mettcollsuss, April 5 2022 - 5:15 AM.

  • ANTdrew and futurebird like this

#6 Offline madbiologist - Posted April 13 2022 - 9:44 AM

madbiologist

    Vendor

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 423 posts
  • LocationOhio

I still believe enough features match, even as nanitics, to safely call these F. subsericea.

Personally, I'm not sure there's enough in these photos to separate them from F. argentea.


  • NickAnter likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users