Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Will Pheidole Colonies Merge?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Offline D.Picta - Posted July 31 2020 - 8:45 AM

D.Picta

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

I have a 2 month old pheidole colony with 100+ workers and a new pheidole queen I caught a week ago. If I put the new queen's test tube inside the other colony's outworld when they have about 10 workers, will the colonies merge to make a 2 queen colony? 



#2 Offline TennesseeAnts - Posted July 31 2020 - 8:47 AM

TennesseeAnts

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,925 posts
  • LocationNashville, Tennessee

That depends on the species. Most likely, no, they will not.


  • D.Picta likes this

#3 Offline TechAnt - Posted July 31 2020 - 10:43 AM

TechAnt

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,303 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, California
Do you know what species they are? If you can say the species for the colonies then we could maybe see if they could merge. Otherwise it’s likely no and the queen would be killed by the colony workers.
  • D.Picta likes this
My Ants:
(x1) Campontous semitstaceus ~20 workers, 1 Queen
(x1) Camponotus vicinus ~10 workers, 1 Queen (all black variety)
(x1) Tetramorium immigrans ~100 workers, 1 Queen
(x1) Myrmercocystus mexicanus -1 Queen
(x2) Mymercocystus mimcus -1 Queen
(x1) Mymercocystus testaceus ~45 workers, 1 Queen

#4 Offline D.Picta - Posted August 3 2020 - 7:09 AM

D.Picta

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

hmm... thanks man. It's pheidole latinoda BTW.

That depends on the species. Most likely, no, they will not.



#5 Offline D.Picta - Posted August 3 2020 - 7:10 AM

D.Picta

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

It's Pheidole Latinoda. I think I should avoid the risk though... Thank you.

Do you know what species they are? If you can say the species for the colonies then we could maybe see if they could merge. Otherwise it’s likely no and the queen would be killed by the colony workers.



#6 Offline ponerinecat - Posted August 3 2020 - 8:25 AM

ponerinecat

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,650 posts
  • LocationCalifornia

It's not worth it imo. It's been proven fairly early on that monogyne colonies produce more workers per queen (in general) so a 2 queen colony doesnt make a drastic enough difference in queen count to change the total population growth by much. Also keep in mind colony growth depends on the amount of resources available, as well as a number of other factors. Simply increasing the queen count while not changing the living conditions won't affect the colony and may even put additional strain on the colony.


  • TennesseeAnts, Antkid12, TechAnt and 1 other like this

#7 Offline D.Picta - Posted August 3 2020 - 11:52 PM

D.Picta

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

oh! i did not know that. That is really helpful information, thank you very much.

It's not worth it imo. It's been proven fairly early on that monogyne colonies produce more workers per queen (in general) so a 2 queen colony doesnt make a drastic enough difference in queen count to change the total population growth by much. Also keep in mind colony growth depends on the amount of resources available, as well as a number of other factors. Simply increasing the queen count while not changing the living conditions won't affect the colony and may even put additional strain on the colony.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users