- Formiculture.com
- Forums
- Gallery
- Members
- Member Map
- Chat
Camponotus Novaeboracensis vs. Camponotus Pennsylvanicus
Started By
MinigunL5
, May 26 2020 4:10 PM
23 replies to this topic
#21 Offline - Posted May 26 2020 - 6:37 PM
They’re probably about the same, but I wouldn’t decide based on that because you can have very different growth rates even within the same species. Some queens are just duds, and there’s no way to find out until they have workers of their own.
"The ants are a people not strong, yet they prepare their meat in the summer." Prov. 30:25
Keep ordinary ants in extraordinary ways.
Keep ordinary ants in extraordinary ways.
#22 Offline - Posted May 26 2020 - 6:38 PM
Which grows faster? C. Novaeboracensis or C. Pennsylvanicus?I personally like the look of C. pennsylvanicus better, as I really like the shiny dark coloration, and their larger size, but I would still advise to keep both till they get decent sized colonies to see which one you like better.
C. pennsylvanicus grows faster in my experience.
- ANTdrew and MinigunL5 like this
My Main Journal | My Neivamyrmex Journal | My Ant Adoption | My YouTube
Join the TennesseeAnts Discord Server! https://discord.gg/JbKwPgs
#23 Offline - Posted May 26 2020 - 6:45 PM
They’re probably about the same, but I wouldn’t decide based on that because you can have very different growth rates even within the same species. Some queens are just duds, and there’s no way to find out until they have workers of their own.
ok
#24 Offline - Posted May 27 2020 - 4:23 AM
novaeboracensis are more colorful and grow faster. I guess I voted nova because they’re rarer than pennsylvanicus in my state, but still.
- MinigunL5 likes this
"God made..... all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds (including ants). And God saw that it was good. Genesis 1:25 NIV version
Keeping:
Formica cf. pallidefulva, cf. incerta, cf. argentea
Formica cf. aserva, cf. subintegra
Myrmica sp.
Lasius neoniger, brevicornis
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users