Jump to content

  • Gallery
  • Members
  • Member Map
  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Huntington Beach Formica 9/29/19

Started By NickAnter , Sep 29 2019 1:10 PM

Best Answer NickAnter , December 4 2019 - 7:16 PM

Formica perpilosa fits in almost all manners, in size, coloration, physical aspects and nesting behavior. I am about 95% sure, but until I am fully sure, I am not marking it solved.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#1 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 1:10 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
1. Location: Huntington Beach, CA
2.Date:9/29/19
3.Habitat: Silty soil near a body of brackish water, about 25 feet away. Next to a suburban area.
4.Length: Varies from worker to worker, from 5-6mm. Head and body shape varies a bit though, larger workers are slightly beefier.
5. Color/texture.Red head and thorax, black abdomen. Smooth in texture.
6.NA
7. Acts like most Formica do.
8.Nest is inconspicuous, no mound, just a 8mm (about) hole.
9. NA





I know I won't get a species ID, but I just want to know species group, or if it is a parasitic species, so if next year, I can find a queen and raise it successfully. Thank you for your answers.

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#2 Offline Martialis - Posted September 29 2019 - 1:12 PM

Martialis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,516 posts
  • LocationMississippi
Certainly a Formica. Usually for a species group ID close-ups of the face can be helpful.
Spoiler

#3 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 1:17 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
I will try. Do you think it is parasitic?

Edited by NickAnter, September 29 2019 - 1:18 PM.

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#4 Offline Da_NewAntOnTheBlock - Posted September 29 2019 - 1:35 PM

Da_NewAntOnTheBlock

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,540 posts
  • LocationIllinois

I will try. Do you think it is parasitic?

Parasitic queens have smaller gasters and larger heads/mandibles. I'm no formica expert so that would be up to someone else to decide, but that's my advice


There is a important time for everything, important place for everyone, an important person for everybody, and an important ant for each and every ant keeper and myrmecologist alike

#5 Offline gcsnelling - Posted September 29 2019 - 2:23 PM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,681 posts

Almost certainly Formica francoeuri.  it is certainly the most common species in that area.


  • TennesseeAnts and NickAnter like this

#6 Offline TennesseeAnts - Posted September 29 2019 - 2:26 PM

TennesseeAnts

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,925 posts
  • LocationNashville, Tennessee

Almost certainly Formica francoeuri.  it is certainly the most common species in that area.


But with that coloration though?

My Main Journal | My Neivamyrmex Journal | My Ant Adoption | My YouTube

Join the TennesseeAnts Discord Server! https://discord.gg/JbKwPgs

#7 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 2:42 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
The head shape certainly fits. Will try very hard to find some queens next year.
  • Da_NewAntOnTheBlock likes this

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#8 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 3:16 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
Hmm. I just looked at F. perpilosa. Looks just like it. Do you think that it is possible that is what they are?

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#9 Offline Manitobant - Posted September 29 2019 - 3:47 PM

Manitobant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,912 posts
  • LocationWinnipeg, Canada

formica moki i think. they are surprisingly not parasitic.


  • NickAnter likes this
My journals:

Polyergus Mexicanus: https://www.formicul...gs/#entry175528
Lasius minutus: https://www.formicul...cs/#entry174811
Lasius latipes: https://www.formicul...gs/#entry206449
General acanthomyops journal: https://www.formicul...yops-with-eggs/

#10 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 4:31 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
I don't think they are F. moki. They are too smooth, and the head is too small.

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#11 Offline gcsnelling - Posted September 29 2019 - 4:51 PM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,681 posts

Hmm. I just looked at F. perpilosa. Looks just like it. Do you think that it is possible that is what they are?

 

If so it would be a bit out of range, coloration is variable in F. francoeuri. F. moki would be highly improbable.


  • TennesseeAnts likes this

#12 Offline AntsBC - Posted September 29 2019 - 5:22 PM

AntsBC

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 317 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

I'm going to have to disagree with Dr. Snelling on this one. F. francoeuri is a hairy species, and this specimen certainly lacks the amount of pubescence typical to F. francoeuri.

 

Formica manni is my guess. At the very least, these guys are in the F. fusca group.

  • NickAnter likes this

My Active Journals:

 

Formica pacifica

Formica planipilis (Parasitic sp.)

 

Instagram // YouTube 

#13 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 5:28 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
F. manni is parasitic, right? There are no hosts around here.

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#14 Offline gcsnelling - Posted September 29 2019 - 5:35 PM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,681 posts

Without seeing the actual specimen it is tough to be sure of the actual degree of pilosity, I agree this ant appears to be on the less than hairy side but the image quality is rather poor and without better images all this is [censored] poor guess work, even my guesses.


#15 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 5:46 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
In the freezer. Once they are dead, I will be able to actually get good pictures, and under the microscope. Just a few more minutes.

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#16 Offline NickAnter - Posted September 29 2019 - 6:25 PM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California
Here is a good macro pic:

Taking pictures through the microscope does not work.
Here is another one:
Another one, from the side:

Edited by NickAnter, September 29 2019 - 6:29 PM.

  • TennesseeAnts and rbarreto like this

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 

#17 Offline gcsnelling - Posted September 30 2019 - 2:25 AM

gcsnelling

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,681 posts

Better images so I will agree this is not F. francoeuri, not sure off hand what it is though so Formica is the best I will confidently go. Really they censored my above post?


Edited by gcsnelling, September 30 2019 - 2:26 AM.

  • Martialis likes this

#18 Offline Martialis - Posted September 30 2019 - 5:20 AM

Martialis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,516 posts
  • LocationMississippi

Better images so I will agree this is not F. francoeuri, not sure off hand what it is though so Formica is the best I will confidently go. Really they censored my above post?

 

Everything is censored.


  • TennesseeAnts likes this
Spoiler

#19 Offline Manitobant - Posted September 30 2019 - 6:50 AM

Manitobant

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,912 posts
  • LocationWinnipeg, Canada
I'm still thinking formica moki. The coloration (especially on the head) and range matches perfectly.
My journals:

Polyergus Mexicanus: https://www.formicul...gs/#entry175528
Lasius minutus: https://www.formicul...cs/#entry174811
Lasius latipes: https://www.formicul...gs/#entry206449
General acanthomyops journal: https://www.formicul...yops-with-eggs/

#20 Offline AntsBC - Posted September 30 2019 - 8:45 AM

AntsBC

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 317 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia, Canada

I'm still thinking formica moki. The coloration (especially on the head) and range matches perfectly.

 

Please do not make identifications, (especially for fusca group Formica), based on color alone. Doing so will just lead people astray.

 

Formica moki is a dull species, with oppressed pubescence present on the gaster. These specimens evidently lack that trait, meaning we can effectively rule out that species. 


Edited by AntsBC, September 30 2019 - 9:24 AM.

My Active Journals:

 

Formica pacifica

Formica planipilis (Parasitic sp.)

 

Instagram // YouTube 

Back to Ant ID Requests · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users