Jump to content

  • Chat
  •  
  •  

Welcome to Formiculture.com!

This is a website for anyone interested in Myrmecology and all aspects of finding, keeping, and studying ants. The site and forum are free to use. Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation points to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Photo

Camponotus sp Nevada City, CA 12-2-19


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Offline fortysixandtwo - Posted December 2 2019 - 1:19 AM

fortysixandtwo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • LocationNor Cal

I caught these queens post nuptial flight in June of this year. I caught 6 total new queens over a large area across several hours. I *think* I have 2 different species of Camponotus. I always have a hard time IDing these to species though. These 2 in particular I am interested in identifying as they are 2 of the 3 most successful colonies of the 6 I caught this year. Each colony has 6-12 workers which are visible in the pictures. I caught these late at night, around maybe 9-11pm. There were quite a lot of them so it appeared the nuptial flights had been late in the day or after dark.

 

Camponotus Colony #1

1. Location (on a map) of collection: Nevada City, Nevada County, California, USA
2. Date of collection: June 2019
3. Habitat of collection: Lower Montane forest zone, Sierra Nevada, elevation ~3800 ft
4. Length: Queen ~14mm
5. Color, hue, pattern and texture: Black
6. Distinguishing characteristics: Queens and workers black. More workers than the other colony, but slightly smaller average size
7. Distinguishing behavior: Colony size 10 workers + queen + >5 brood (no fatalities)
8. Nest description: N/A

9. Nuptial flight time and date: June, found after dark

 

My guess: C. modoc

 

Camponotus Colony #5

1. Location of collection: Nevada City, Nevada County, California, USA
2. Date of collection: June 2019
3. Habitat of collection: Lower Montane forest zone, Sierra Nevada, elevation ~3800 ft
4. Length: Queen ~15mm
5. Color, hue, pattern and texture: Mostly black, some faint orangish or brown visible on thorax and abdomen of queen
6. Distinguishing characteristics: Orangish/brownish coloration on queen, workers black. Less workers than the other colony, but they appear slightly larger on average
7. Distinguishing behavior: Colony size 6 workers + queen + <5 brood (no fatalities)
8. Nest description: N/A

9. Nuptial flight time and date: June, found after dark

 

My Guess: C. vicinus

 

Maybe these are the same species I dunno. I uploaded better photos of colony 1. See my reply below for Colony #5 photos.

Attached Images

  • D75_4525*LPS.jpg
  • D75_4490*LPS.jpg
  • Colony1-workerwbrood.jpg
  • D75_4536*LPS.jpg

Edited by fortysixandtwo, December 2 2019 - 6:39 PM.

  • Zeiss and Martialis like this

#2 Offline Martialis - Posted December 2 2019 - 6:46 AM

Martialis

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,516 posts
  • LocationMississippi

An accurate species ID can’t be made with this resolution

 

Better pictures are here. These are adequate.


Edited by Martialis, December 3 2019 - 6:04 AM.

  • fortysixandtwo likes this
Spoiler

#3 Offline fortysixandtwo - Posted December 2 2019 - 6:25 PM

fortysixandtwo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • LocationNor Cal

Here are better pictures of Colony #5.

Attached Images

  • Colony5sideview1.jpg
  • Colony5sideview2.jpg
  • Colony5sideview3.jpg
  • Colony5vertical.jpg
  • Colony5worker.jpg

  • Martialis likes this

#4 Offline Broncos - Posted December 3 2019 - 4:26 PM

Broncos

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 724 posts
  • LocationOrange, California
Maybe camponotus modoc or penncylvanicus


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • fortysixandtwo likes this

Currently Keeping:

Pogonomyrmex Californicus Bicolor & Concolor

Pogonomyrmex Subnitidius

Camponotus Sansabeanus

Youtube:https://www.youtube....-ants-tutorials


#5 Offline fortysixandtwo - Posted December 3 2019 - 11:50 PM

fortysixandtwo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • LocationNor Cal

Maybe camponotus modoc or penncylvanicus


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

In comparison to some C. modoc pictures I have looked at the head doesn't seem large enough on either of these to be modoc. I am not sure if C. penncylvanicus is found in California?

 

Someone on FB made the suggestion these may be Camponotus laevigatus



#6 Offline NickAnter - Posted December 4 2019 - 7:01 AM

NickAnter

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • LocationOrange County, California

These are both Camponotus vicinus, they are not modoc, not enough hair on the gaster. They are not large enough, and do not have the correct head shape to be laevigatus.


Edited by NickAnter, December 4 2019 - 7:02 AM.

  • Manitobant and Somethinghmm like this

Hi there! I went on a 6 month or so hiatus, in part due, and in part cause of the death of my colonies. 

However, I went back to the Sierras, and restarted my collection, which is now as follows:

Aphaenogaster uinta, Camponotus vicinus, Camponotus modoc, Formica cf. aserva, Formica cf. micropthalma, Formica cf. manni, Formica subpolita, Formica cf. subaenescens, Lasius americanus, Manica invidia, Pogonomyrmex salinus, Pogonomyrmex sp. 1, Solenopsis validiuscula, & Solenopsis sp. 3 (new Sierra variant). 


#7 Offline fortysixandtwo - Posted December 5 2019 - 12:32 AM

fortysixandtwo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 98 posts
  • LocationNor Cal

These are both Camponotus vicinus, they are not modoc, not enough hair on the gaster. They are not large enough, and do not have the correct head shape to be laevigatus.

 

That is what I suspected but I wasn't sure. Thanks






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users