I found a bunch of Tetramorium queens this morning during a flight. I was wondering if I could combine some or would they kill each other in a day? Thanks!
- Formiculture.com
- Forums
- Gallery
- Members
- Member Map
- Chat
I found a bunch of Tetramorium queens this morning during a flight. I was wondering if I could combine some or would they kill each other in a day? Thanks!
Tetramorium Immigran (8 Workers)
Myrmica Queen (Not 100% on species)
Formica Subsericea (No workers)
Tetramorium immigrans is pleometrotic. Meaning they will cooperate during founding, but one way or the other, only one queen will remain. In the case of Tetramorium immigrans the queens fight until only one remains. However, this is not the only way queens can be removed in pleometrotic ant species.
That being said, there are multiple species of Tetramorium in the United States. Some are truly polygynous. I could liken asking if an entire genus is polygynous to asking what color Camponotus are. It is going to vary between species, obviously.
If you would like to know whether or not your Tetramorium sp. is polygynous, I would suggest you start off with IDing them on a species level.
Currently Keeping:
Trachymyrmex septentrionalis
Pheidole pilifera
Forelius sp. (Monogynous, bicolored) "Midwestern Forelius"
Crematogaster cerasi
Pheidole bicarinata
Aphaenogaster rudis
Camponotus chromaiodes
Formica sp. (microgena species)
Nylanderia cf. arenivega
I'd like to point out that many conventionally pleometronic species will sometimes lean towards polygyny. For example, I once had a Lasius americanus colony which supported 2 queens well over 2000 workers despite the fact that in almost all foundings I've recorded of the species, these ants would start killing each other after workers arrived. Specifically for Tetramorium, I once observed a captive colony that kept 2 queens well after their first workers, at the 800 worker mark, though eventually one of the queens died for unknown reasons (pleometronic behavior kicking in might still be a possibility)Tetramorium immigrans is pleometrotic. Meaning they will cooperate during founding, but one way or the other, only one queen will remain. In the case of Tetramorium immigrans the queens fight until only one remains. However, this is not the only way queens can be removed in pleometrotic ant species.
That being said, there are multiple species of Tetramorium in the United States. Some are truly polygynous. I could liken asking if an entire genus is polygynous to asking what color Camponotus are. It is going to vary between species, obviously.
If you would like to know whether or not your Tetramorium sp. is polygynous, I would suggest you start off with IDing them on a species level.
Edited by Canadian anter, July 11 2019 - 9:32 AM.
Strong emphasis on MIGHT. Those two cases are the only ones where I've seen either species actually maintain both queens for extended periods of time. This is more of a case-by case exception rather than the rule.So some pleometric species might be able to stand polygyny even if is is usually pleometric do you know of any other species like this?
Tetramorium immigrans is pleometrotic. Meaning they will cooperate during founding, but one way or the other, only one queen will remain. In the case of Tetramorium immigrans the queens fight until only one remains. However, this is not the only way queens can be removed in pleometrotic ant species.
That being said, there are multiple species of Tetramorium in the United States. Some are truly polygynous. I could liken asking if an entire genus is polygynous to asking what color Camponotus are. It is going to vary between species, obviously.
If you would like to know whether or not your Tetramorium sp. is polygynous, I would suggest you start off with IDing them on a species level.
Sorry about that. I will get them identified soon and make an update as to what species they are.
Tetramorium Immigran (8 Workers)
Myrmica Queen (Not 100% on species)
Formica Subsericea (No workers)
I'd like to point out that many conventionally pleometronic species will sometimes lean towards polygyny. For example, I once had a Lasius americanus colony which supported 2 queens well over 2000 workers despite the fact that in almost all foundings I've recorded of the species, these ants would start killing each other after workers arrived. Specifically for Tetramorium, I once observed a captive colony that kept 2 queens well after their first workers, at the 800 worker mark, though eventually one of the queens died for unknown reasons (pleometronic behavior kicking in might still be a possibility)Tetramorium immigrans is pleometrotic. Meaning they will cooperate during founding, but one way or the other, only one queen will remain. In the case of Tetramorium immigrans the queens fight until only one remains. However, this is not the only way queens can be removed in pleometrotic ant species.
That being said, there are multiple species of Tetramorium in the United States. Some are truly polygynous. I could liken asking if an entire genus is polygynous to asking what color Camponotus are. It is going to vary between species, obviously.
If you would like to know whether or not your Tetramorium sp. is polygynous, I would suggest you start off with IDing them on a species level.
Edit: Yes it was Tetramorium immigrans and not Tetramorium tsushimae
I almost included a paragraph about how there are no "strict rules" on polgyny in ants, haha. It can definitely happen, and does, I'm sure. In numerous species they've been found to maintain multiple queens in certain conditions, killing them in others. Brachymyrmex patagonicus for example has been able to maintain polygyny in lab colonies but a wild colony has never been found with more than one queen. The reverse is true for Solenopsis xyloni and Solenopsis geminata.
As humans we tend to think about things in absolute terms. Ants are either polygynous or monogynous. This is simply not the case. That being said, ants do tend to stick to previously observed behavior. I just figured I'd leave out this complicated subject because who I was responding to appears to be a beginner and I figured they don't need the confusion considering something like that is only going to happen in a very few instances.
Currently Keeping:
Trachymyrmex septentrionalis
Pheidole pilifera
Forelius sp. (Monogynous, bicolored) "Midwestern Forelius"
Crematogaster cerasi
Pheidole bicarinata
Aphaenogaster rudis
Camponotus chromaiodes
Formica sp. (microgena species)
Nylanderia cf. arenivega
Tetramorium immigrans is pleometrotic. Meaning they will cooperate during founding, but one way or the other, only one queen will remain. In the case of Tetramorium immigrans the queens fight until only one remains. However, this is not the only way queens can be removed in pleometrotic ant species.
That was the term I was looking for, pleometrotic. I just got a bunch of p. californicus and the person that sold me my queens said they start a colony together but eventually there will only be 1 queen in the end. The wiki article talks about its benefit out in the wild but I wonder if the same benefit is worthwhile in captivity since there are no competing colonies to worry about. The pros are faster colony growth and possibly strongest queen/reproduction? Con I guess is all the other queens dying off.. and maybe brood cannibalism.
Ant Journal: http://www.formicult...-journal/<br> My colonies: C. Semitestaceus, P. Californicus, V. Pergandei, S. Xyloni.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users